Communiques of ITS
Forums
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/individualists-tending-toward-t…
Eight communiques (plus a brief note) over three years from Mexico. Things would never be the same again.
Thoughts?
It's psychologically…
It's psychologically interesting reading, seeing a group of people so slavishly invested in one person's philosophy:
"Many parts of the group’s communiqués are merely paraphrases of [Ted K's] Manifesto: ‘The essence of the power process has four parts: setting out of the goal, effort, attainment of the goal, and Autonomy’."
I think they reflect Ted K when he was at his most hopeless, trying to bomb airplanes out the sky because of how annoyed he was by the noise of them flying over where he lived:
"Ted in prison has argued to the extent they are organising with others they should be working to bring about a primitivist revolution in going after riskier targets like electricity grid stations. But it’s almost as if ITS feel being able to do random attacks is what’s owed to them by being free and that to listen to Ted now would be helping serve his needs as a theorist from prison, to the detriment of their own desires."
Further reading: Ted Kaczynski's Various Ethical & Political Flirtations: https://www.thetedkarchive.com/library/various-ted-kaczynski-s-various-…
It's psychologically…
It's psychologically interesting, seeing a person so slavishly invested in Psychology, the most bullshit of all bullshit sciences.
There were no 'random attacks' in the first (or second*) phase of ITS. Why not try actually reading the communiques?
* https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/wild-reaction-the-communiques-o…
Some initial thoughts
“For many years, texts from an eco-extremist (EE) group calling themselves “Individuals Tending toward the Wild” or ITS, were on the library, as they once claimed to be anarchist-influenced. No problems were raised over those years. The library stopped publishing the ITS communiques and related texts once they stopped calling themselves anarchists and started claiming indiscriminate attacks against hikers, and there were some attacks in Mexico City. The library has not had writings by ITS since then.”The part of the library no longer publishing texts by ITS is often left out of every single critique of the project for publishing ITS. Many of these, or practically every single one of these critics seems to portray the project as one that has published ITS texts about indiscriminate violence against hikers and the attacks in DF, even though the library has never published the texts. I imagine that the critiques often leave this out because they don’t take the time to actually read and look into the storied past of this or perhaps purposely to incite reactions and attempt to falsely prove their point. One of the exceptions to no longer publishing ITS texts comes from the recent “Los Hijos del Mencho” response text that was also published in the Black Seed journal, as it is relevant for the entire discussion. The text can be found here.
Going back to what some librarians wrote about this in 2018:
“ITS texts have. ITS came out of the anarchist space and how far from it they've found (or removed) themselves from it is of interest to some anarchists. It is part of our history and is completely appropriate for it to appear on an archival project documenting anarchist and related texts. Reading things by people we disagree with (or making such readings accessible to other people) is not condoning the things we disagree with, much less supporting them. Anyone who insists on banning particular texts from the library because they personally disagree with the content is acting to indoctrinate, not allowing people to make up their own minds. ”
It has been recommended by some that the library have canned responses about certain text that have been published on the website, which might be something to work on and include on the library wiki or these library forums in the future.
I have to say the reason why…
I have to say the reason why most people hate this is because it is indigenous people embracing the violence that our ancestors used against the colonizers and it scares them because black white left right cis or trans you all benefit from colonization of our people and anytime we rise up you mother fuckers try to fash jacket us or call us Nazi or eco-fascists
eco-extremism, as it is called or really Natives embracing their identity, scares people because we don't care who you are, what your identity is, what your politics are, what your gender is, what your sex is, if you are benefiting from the colonization of our people you are an enemy, and even if we don't attack you, if you are a casualty, we don't give a fuck
I'd point out that…
I'd point out that indiscriminate attacks by anarchists are nothing new. ITS were not the first nor are they the last. Devices have been left by anarchists in public places in Greece this year. I don't remember anyone in our milieu losing their shit over that, do you?
Add new comment