By numbering anonymous contributions - say a hash of the date of the first then adding numbers onto that - 001, 002, 003, etc the average reader may then learn to recognize good-faith efforts from cynical trolling.
And if they don't like being numbered then they can take a few minutes to think up a pseudonym / nom de plume / nom de guerre that rocks our world.
Reading every anon comment on Reddit style boards is a bridge too far when ' assertions without evidence may be dismissed without examination "
We're already drowning in data - help us Anon-one - you're our only hope. ( Sorry for the Royal ' we " )
What is the logic behind not numbering Anons?
By numbering anonymous contributions - say a hash of the date of the first then adding numbers onto that - 001, 002, 003, etc the average reader may then learn to recognize good-faith efforts from cynical trolling.
And if they don't like being numbered then they can take a few minutes to think up a pseudonym / nom de plume / nom de guerre that rocks our world.
Reading every anon comment on Reddit style boards is a bridge too far when ' assertions without evidence may be dismissed without examination "
We're already drowning in data - help us Anon-one - you're our only hope. ( Sorry for the Royal ' we " )