While I will agree that rules should exist in anarchy and that anarchy is order, a rule-enforcing library is a ruler. To enact rules upon another, especially without any say, is sovereignty. Being able to delete something from another on this archive is ruling over the people. This use of enforcing another allows for this library to have more power than others in this archive. Therefore this causes inequality that cannot stand with anarchism.
I am going to have to disagree.
In reply to nope by buddy (not verified)
While I will agree that rules should exist in anarchy and that anarchy is order, a rule-enforcing library is a ruler. To enact rules upon another, especially without any say, is sovereignty. Being able to delete something from another on this archive is ruling over the people. This use of enforcing another allows for this library to have more power than others in this archive. Therefore this causes inequality that cannot stand with anarchism.