Skip to main content

Add new comment

Anonymous (not verified) Sun, 09/18/2022 - 18:50

In reply to by @balm

The sloppiness is precisely what renders both kt’s and the egoist’s arguments outside of the realm of discourse. Whether “wildness” or the “unique” both camps, in my experience, claim their core concept as ineffable, and thus beyond the critique of those not fortunate or worthy of grasping its meaning. Furthermore, it grants each with an exclusive perch from which to set terms and pick apart opponents. Reminds me of Hume’s description of the critic as one who looks over everyone else’s shoulder while attempting to convince them he has none.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
Security
627134859Click/tap this sequence: 4192
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.